GOVERNMENT POLICY STRATEGY ON FREE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION IN BANTEN

Authors

  • Barkah Purnama Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Bryan Pratama Djunaidy Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58432/algebra.v5i3.1426

Keywords:

Free Education;, Government Policy;, High School/Vocational High School; , Banten Province;, Access to Education.

Abstract

This study discusses the policy strategies of the Banten Provincial Government in implementing free education programs at the high school/vocational school level. The primary focus of the study is to analyze the government's efforts to improve access to education and reduce dropout rates, particularly during the transition from junior high school to senior high school. However, in its implementation, the program still faces various challenges, such as budget constraints, inadequate educational infrastructure, and disparities in the quality of educational services between urban and rural areas. Additionally, affirmative policies for vulnerable groups, such as poor families and people with disabilities, are still suboptimal, while the quality and distribution of educators are not evenly distributed across the Banten region. This study uses a qualitative approach with in-depth interviews conducted at the Banten Provincial Education Office (KP3B Serang). The research findings recommend the need for improved inter-institutional coordination, equitable distribution of human resources, and accelerated development of educational facilities in underdeveloped areas such as Lebak and Pandeglang. With a more adaptive approach to local needs, this free education policy is expected to promote equitable access and improved educational quality in Banten Province, thereby fostering the development of superior and competitive human resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditomo, A., & Felicia. (2018). Kilas Pendidikan Edisi17 Ketimpangan Mutu dan Akses Pendidikan di Indonesia.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work.

Darmaningtyas. (2012). Pendidikan yang Memiskinkan: Kritik terhadap Praktik Pendidikan yang Tidak Membebaskan.

Michael W. Apple. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. In RoutledgeFalmer (3rd Edition). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203487563

Nababan Kartyka, & Marpaung Melda Esterlina. (2024). METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF BIDANG PENDIDIKAN: KONSEP DAN APLIKASI.

Sadiman, A. S. (2018). Strategi Peningkatan Partisipasi Pendidikan Melalui Insentif Pemerintah.

Sen. (1999). The Globalization and Development Reader.

Sugiyono. (2015). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF KUALITATIF DAN R&D.

Supriyadi. (2020). Peran Pemerintah Daerah dalam Mewujudkan Pendidikan Inklusif di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 7(2), 85–94.

Suyahman. (2016). ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS DAN KAITANNYA DENGAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN MENENGAH ATAS.

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2009). Kekuasaan dan Pendidikan: Manajemen Pendidikan Nasional dalam Pusaran Kekuasaan.

Yusuf, M., & Wahyudi, A. (2017). Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Keadilan Sosial: Perspektif Teoritis dan Praktik di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(1), 45–53.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-23

How to Cite

Purnama, B., & Djunaidy, B. P. (2025). GOVERNMENT POLICY STRATEGY ON FREE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION IN BANTEN. Algebra : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Sains, 5(3), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.58432/algebra.v5i3.1426