CONCEIVE-DESIGN-IMPLEMENT-OPERATE (CDIO) INNOVATIVE TEACHING METHODS IN REAL ESTATE EDUCATION

Authors

  • Noorsidi Aizuddin Mat Noor Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Farhana Diana Deris Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Mustafa Omar Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Hamdi Abdul Hamid Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
  • Afizan Mokhtar University Technology of Mara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58432/algebra.v4i3.1120

Abstract

ABSTRAK

The presented research aims to investigate the impact of the CDIO framework on changing the existing learning-teaching paradigm in real estate education in Malaysia to improve learning engagement and students’ critical thinking skills. On this note, the use of traditional teaching approaches that involve lectures in real estate education is found to be lacking in meeting the needs of the dynamic market, therefore calling for innovation. This research uses quantitative and qualitative data from 150 students from three universities: pre and post intervention questionnaires, focus group discussions, and class observations. The studies reveal that after intervention, the extent of students’ participation increased from 35% to 75%, and there are improvements in students’ critical thinking skills; the average scores from pre-tests of 60% rose to 80% post-tests. From the students’ perspective, CDIO promoted meaningful learning based on project-centred learning activities done in a contextual manner, improving the perceived relevancy of learning activities. Therefore, the present research substantiates that CDIO methodologies integrate practice and research to positively transform student learning experiences, activity levels, and critical analysis, strongly advocating for real estate educational reform in the Malaysian context. It means the focus on project-based active learning prepares students to solve actual problems that affect them and brings education and skills in line with the requirements of the given sphere. Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations should be made for future research: The effectiveness of CDIO integration and its long-term implications should be investigated. Broader implications point to the idea that implementing CDIO-inspired approaches provides a workforce that is more competent and better synchronised, which is imperative in a continuously transforming real estate market within Malaysia and other states.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. G. K., & Majid, M. S. A. (2013). The impact of traditional teaching methods on students’ academic performance in real estate education. Asian Social Science, 9(12), 32-39.

Abdullah, S., Nah, M., & Razak, A. (2015). Real Estate Management in Malaysian Public Schools: Determination of Success Factors. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 23, 52 - 67. https://doi.org/10.1515/remav-2015-0015.

Abidin, A., Hidayat, M., Abdullah, S., & Bakar, H. (2017). The mapping of CDIO skills set with EAC program outcome (PO). 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251156.

Azasu, S., & Gibler, K. (2017). The CDIO Model for Real Estate Curriculum Development. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 24, 287.

Bankel, J., Berggren, K. F., Blom, K., Crawley, E. F., Östlund, S., Soderholm, D., & Wiklund, I. (2003). The CDIO syllabus: A comparative study of expected student proficiency. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(3), 297-315.

Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A., & Brodeur, D. R. (2007). The CDIO syllabus v2.0: An updated statement of goals for engineering education. In Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference (pp. 24-26).

Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer.

Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539-555.

Edström, K., Malmqvist, J., & Roslöf, J. (2020). Scholarly development of engineering education – the CDIO approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45, 1 - 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1704361.

Halim, M., & Buniyamin, N. (2016). A comparison between CDIO and EAC engineering education learning outcomes. 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856076.

Jambari, H., Razali, N., Taman, I., Osman, S., Ahmad, J., Nordin, N., & Rameli, M. (2018). Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) Approach For An Innovative Capstone Project. Journal of Technical Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.30880/JTET.2018.10.02.008.

Kamsah, M., & Talib, R. (2014). An Engineering Education Framework For Fulfilling The Outcome- Based Education Requirements. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 4, 59-69.

Magallanes, S., & Hasan, J. (2023). Community Involvement in an English Classroom of a TVET Institution in Malaysia: An Application of CDIO for Non-Engineering Program and Modified Design Thinking Model. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Community Engagement and Education for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.21467/proceedings.151.49.

O’Connor, S., Power, J., & Blom, N. (2023). A systematic review of CDIO knowledge library publications (2010 – 2020): An Overview of trends and recommendations for future research. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 166 - 180. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2220265.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Rahman, R. A., & Ismail, S. (2018). Challenges in real estate education in Malaysia. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 12(2), 45-54.

Tran, T., & Phan, T. (2022). Development of CDIO-Based Programs from the Teacher Training Perspective. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.11.

Yusof, N. A., Azmi, N. F., & Aziz, N. A. (2012). Implementing CDIO approach in property development education: A case study. Journal of Education for Business, 87(6), 340-345.

Published

2024-10-21

How to Cite

Mat Noor, N. A., Diana Deris, F., Omar, M. ., Abdul Hamid, H. ., & Mokhtar, A. . (2024). CONCEIVE-DESIGN-IMPLEMENT-OPERATE (CDIO) INNOVATIVE TEACHING METHODS IN REAL ESTATE EDUCATION. Algebra : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Sains, 4(3), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.58432/algebra.v4i3.1120

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.